spatial transcriptomics st technology Search Results


90
BGI Shenzhen spatial transcriptome (st)
Spatial Transcriptome (St), supplied by BGI Shenzhen, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/spatial transcriptome (st)/product/BGI Shenzhen
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
spatial transcriptome (st) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Spatial Transcriptomics Inc spatial transcriptomics st
(A) Schematic of spatial <t>transcriptomics</t> study workflow. Table S1 contains metadata for each sample. (B) Schematic of skin, representative hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) image and corresponding ST plot (left-to-right). Scale bar = 440μm (C) UMAP visualization of 3,815 spots colored by cluster obtained from healthy skin samples (N=3, n=5). (D) Composition plots displaying relative abundance of each cluster by sample. Note up to two samples (labeled S) were collected from each Healthy Volunteer (HV). Replicate arrays are labeled “R” along the X axis. (E) Integration with a publicly-sourced single cell RNA-seq data set (dataset 1) with a representative ST spatial feature plot. See Figure S4 for UMAP of annotated cell type clusters. SMC=smooth muscle cell. Scale bar = 520μm (F) Multimodal intersection analysis (MIA) of overlap between data from datasets 1 and 2 and our ST-generated clusters. A sample hypergeometric distribution of keratinocyte cluster from dataset 1 and our epidermis cluster (cluster 6). MIA enrichment heatmaps of non-immune cell types in dataset 1 (G) and dataset 2 (H) and ST clusters from healthy skin. The X axis denotes the scRNA seq-identified cell types while the Y axis represents the ST-generated clusters. Differentiated keratinocytes (Diff KC) lymphatic endothelium (LE), proliferating keratinocytes (Prolif KC), vascular endothelium (VE), keratinocyte (KC). (I) MIA heatmap showing the enrichment of scRNA-seq-identified adipose- cell types from Hildreth et al. within pooled healthy skin ST clusters. (J) KEGG pathway analysis of the adipose cluster (cluster 2).
Spatial Transcriptomics St, supplied by Spatial Transcriptomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/spatial transcriptomics st/product/Spatial Transcriptomics Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
spatial transcriptomics st - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Spatial Transcriptomics Inc mouse olfactory bulb st data
Analysis of <t>mouse</t> <t>olfactory</t> <t>bulb</t> <t>data.</t> a) H&E staining of the olfactory bulb (top) and the deconvolution results of all candidate methods displayed by the spatial scatter pie plot of cell‐type composition on each spatial location. The examined cell types were granule cells (GC), olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs), periglomerular cells (PGC), mitral/tufted cells (M‐TC), and external plexiform layer interneurons (EPL‐IN) b) Manual annotation of anatomic layers (top), including the granule cell layer (GCL), the mitral cell layer (MCL), the glomerular layer (GL), and the nerve layer (ONL), and the spatial domains of different deconvolution methods visualized by spatial scatters of specific domain types. c) Performance comparison between candidate deconvolution methods, including QR‐SIDE, STdeconvolve, CARDfree, RCTD, CARD, SPOTlight, and spatialDWLS in terms of NMI (left) and ARI (right). d) UMAP plots of gene expression for Topic 1, 2, 3 identified by QR‐SIDE. The color scheme of each topic domain was the same as in (b). e) The heatmap of normalized expression level for the top 10 DE genes for topic domain 1, 2, 3. f) The correlation between DE genes of identified domains and marker genes of each cell type. g) The mean expression level of an example marker gene list for QR‐SIDE, where Tyro3 was included as the interference marker gene of cell type GC. h) Left and middle panels: The estimated spot‐separable η scores of correct marker Penk and misclassified marker Tyro3 . Right panel: The line plots of mean η of all markers across all spatial spots and the RMSE between estimated cell‐type composition by varying the inclusion of top 3‐7 marker genes of each cell type as the input gene list and the deconvolution results using high‐quality marker genes (as shown in a).
Mouse Olfactory Bulb St Data, supplied by Spatial Transcriptomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse olfactory bulb st data/product/Spatial Transcriptomics Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse olfactory bulb st data - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Spatial Transcriptomics Inc salus sts high resolution spatial transcriptomics
<t>Salus-STS</t> <t>high-resolution</t> spatial <t>transcriptomics</t> enables effective cell identification at the subcellular level. (A) Schematics illustrating of the study. (B) Results of cell segmentation via the Salus Cellbins Algorithm. (C–F) Distributions and medians (red text in the figures) of the area (in pixel 2 ) (C) , UMI counts (D) , gene numbers (E) , and proportions of mitochondrial UMIs (F) of segmented cellbins.
Salus Sts High Resolution Spatial Transcriptomics, supplied by Spatial Transcriptomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/salus sts high resolution spatial transcriptomics/product/Spatial Transcriptomics Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
salus sts high resolution spatial transcriptomics - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Spatial Transcriptomics Inc geomx dsp ○ high plex spatial proteomics
<t>Salus-STS</t> <t>high-resolution</t> spatial <t>transcriptomics</t> enables effective cell identification at the subcellular level. (A) Schematics illustrating of the study. (B) Results of cell segmentation via the Salus Cellbins Algorithm. (C–F) Distributions and medians (red text in the figures) of the area (in pixel 2 ) (C) , UMI counts (D) , gene numbers (E) , and proportions of mitochondrial UMIs (F) of segmented cellbins.
Geomx Dsp ○ High Plex Spatial Proteomics, supplied by Spatial Transcriptomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/geomx dsp ○ high plex spatial proteomics/product/Spatial Transcriptomics Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
geomx dsp ○ high plex spatial proteomics - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Spatial Transcriptomics Inc spatial transcriptomics st autoencoder
SpaIM comprises an ST <t>autoencoder</t> and an ST generator. Both the ST autoencoder and the ST generator are built on the multilayer recursive style transfer (ReST) layers.
Spatial Transcriptomics St Autoencoder, supplied by Spatial Transcriptomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/spatial transcriptomics st autoencoder/product/Spatial Transcriptomics Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
spatial transcriptomics st autoencoder - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Spatial Transcriptomics Inc visium spatial transcriptomics st
SpaIM comprises an ST <t>autoencoder</t> and an ST generator. Both the ST autoencoder and the ST generator are built on the multilayer recursive style transfer (ReST) layers.
Visium Spatial Transcriptomics St, supplied by Spatial Transcriptomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/visium spatial transcriptomics st/product/Spatial Transcriptomics Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
visium spatial transcriptomics st - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Spatial Transcriptomics Inc transcriptomics st
SpaIM comprises an ST <t>autoencoder</t> and an ST generator. Both the ST autoencoder and the ST generator are built on the multilayer recursive style transfer (ReST) layers.
Transcriptomics St, supplied by Spatial Transcriptomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/transcriptomics st/product/Spatial Transcriptomics Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
transcriptomics st - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Spatial Transcriptomics Inc scatac seq
SpaIM comprises an ST <t>autoencoder</t> and an ST generator. Both the ST autoencoder and the ST generator are built on the multilayer recursive style transfer (ReST) layers.
Scatac Seq, supplied by Spatial Transcriptomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/scatac seq/product/Spatial Transcriptomics Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
scatac seq - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Spatial Transcriptomics Inc spatial transcriptomics st slides
SpaIM comprises an ST <t>autoencoder</t> and an ST generator. Both the ST autoencoder and the ST generator are built on the multilayer recursive style transfer (ReST) layers.
Spatial Transcriptomics St Slides, supplied by Spatial Transcriptomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/spatial transcriptomics st slides/product/Spatial Transcriptomics Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
spatial transcriptomics st slides - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Spatial Transcriptomics Inc spatial transcriptomics st generator
a Benchmarking results on the NanoString CosMx spatial <t>transcriptomics</t> dataset (Lung5–rep3), using evaluation metrics including structural similarity index measure (SSIM) and Jaccard similarity (JS). Data are presented as mean values ± 95% confidence intervals across predicted genes ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$n$$\end{document} n = 2,038). b Spatial visualization of cell types in the whole slide. c Spatial visualization of cell types in specific field of views (FOVs).
Spatial Transcriptomics St Generator, supplied by Spatial Transcriptomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/spatial transcriptomics st generator/product/Spatial Transcriptomics Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
spatial transcriptomics st generator - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Spatial Transcriptomics Inc genomics visium spatial transcriptomics technology
Major cell type annotation. Spatially resolved transcriptome ( A ) and t-SNE plots ( B ) showing representation of five major cell types in the tongue tissue. ( C ) Cell Chat software revealed the number and strength of inferred cellular signaling interactions from the spatial <t>transcriptomics</t> data.
Genomics Visium Spatial Transcriptomics Technology, supplied by Spatial Transcriptomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/genomics visium spatial transcriptomics technology/product/Spatial Transcriptomics Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
genomics visium spatial transcriptomics technology - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


(A) Schematic of spatial transcriptomics study workflow. Table S1 contains metadata for each sample. (B) Schematic of skin, representative hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) image and corresponding ST plot (left-to-right). Scale bar = 440μm (C) UMAP visualization of 3,815 spots colored by cluster obtained from healthy skin samples (N=3, n=5). (D) Composition plots displaying relative abundance of each cluster by sample. Note up to two samples (labeled S) were collected from each Healthy Volunteer (HV). Replicate arrays are labeled “R” along the X axis. (E) Integration with a publicly-sourced single cell RNA-seq data set (dataset 1) with a representative ST spatial feature plot. See Figure S4 for UMAP of annotated cell type clusters. SMC=smooth muscle cell. Scale bar = 520μm (F) Multimodal intersection analysis (MIA) of overlap between data from datasets 1 and 2 and our ST-generated clusters. A sample hypergeometric distribution of keratinocyte cluster from dataset 1 and our epidermis cluster (cluster 6). MIA enrichment heatmaps of non-immune cell types in dataset 1 (G) and dataset 2 (H) and ST clusters from healthy skin. The X axis denotes the scRNA seq-identified cell types while the Y axis represents the ST-generated clusters. Differentiated keratinocytes (Diff KC) lymphatic endothelium (LE), proliferating keratinocytes (Prolif KC), vascular endothelium (VE), keratinocyte (KC). (I) MIA heatmap showing the enrichment of scRNA-seq-identified adipose- cell types from Hildreth et al. within pooled healthy skin ST clusters. (J) KEGG pathway analysis of the adipose cluster (cluster 2).

Journal: Science immunology

Article Title: Spatial transcriptomics stratifies psoriatic disease severity by emergent cellular ecosystems

doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abq7991

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Schematic of spatial transcriptomics study workflow. Table S1 contains metadata for each sample. (B) Schematic of skin, representative hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) image and corresponding ST plot (left-to-right). Scale bar = 440μm (C) UMAP visualization of 3,815 spots colored by cluster obtained from healthy skin samples (N=3, n=5). (D) Composition plots displaying relative abundance of each cluster by sample. Note up to two samples (labeled S) were collected from each Healthy Volunteer (HV). Replicate arrays are labeled “R” along the X axis. (E) Integration with a publicly-sourced single cell RNA-seq data set (dataset 1) with a representative ST spatial feature plot. See Figure S4 for UMAP of annotated cell type clusters. SMC=smooth muscle cell. Scale bar = 520μm (F) Multimodal intersection analysis (MIA) of overlap between data from datasets 1 and 2 and our ST-generated clusters. A sample hypergeometric distribution of keratinocyte cluster from dataset 1 and our epidermis cluster (cluster 6). MIA enrichment heatmaps of non-immune cell types in dataset 1 (G) and dataset 2 (H) and ST clusters from healthy skin. The X axis denotes the scRNA seq-identified cell types while the Y axis represents the ST-generated clusters. Differentiated keratinocytes (Diff KC) lymphatic endothelium (LE), proliferating keratinocytes (Prolif KC), vascular endothelium (VE), keratinocyte (KC). (I) MIA heatmap showing the enrichment of scRNA-seq-identified adipose- cell types from Hildreth et al. within pooled healthy skin ST clusters. (J) KEGG pathway analysis of the adipose cluster (cluster 2).

Article Snippet: Spatial Transcriptomics (ST) faithfully maps gene expression in healthy human skin We developed a human skin specific protocol for 10X Genomics Visium platform and performed ST on 25 skin samples collected from 3 healthy controls and 11 patients with PsO/PsA ( , figs. S1, A to C , S14A and table S1 ).

Techniques: Labeling, RNA Sequencing, Generated

Analysis of mouse olfactory bulb data. a) H&E staining of the olfactory bulb (top) and the deconvolution results of all candidate methods displayed by the spatial scatter pie plot of cell‐type composition on each spatial location. The examined cell types were granule cells (GC), olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs), periglomerular cells (PGC), mitral/tufted cells (M‐TC), and external plexiform layer interneurons (EPL‐IN) b) Manual annotation of anatomic layers (top), including the granule cell layer (GCL), the mitral cell layer (MCL), the glomerular layer (GL), and the nerve layer (ONL), and the spatial domains of different deconvolution methods visualized by spatial scatters of specific domain types. c) Performance comparison between candidate deconvolution methods, including QR‐SIDE, STdeconvolve, CARDfree, RCTD, CARD, SPOTlight, and spatialDWLS in terms of NMI (left) and ARI (right). d) UMAP plots of gene expression for Topic 1, 2, 3 identified by QR‐SIDE. The color scheme of each topic domain was the same as in (b). e) The heatmap of normalized expression level for the top 10 DE genes for topic domain 1, 2, 3. f) The correlation between DE genes of identified domains and marker genes of each cell type. g) The mean expression level of an example marker gene list for QR‐SIDE, where Tyro3 was included as the interference marker gene of cell type GC. h) Left and middle panels: The estimated spot‐separable η scores of correct marker Penk and misclassified marker Tyro3 . Right panel: The line plots of mean η of all markers across all spatial spots and the RMSE between estimated cell‐type composition by varying the inclusion of top 3‐7 marker genes of each cell type as the input gene list and the deconvolution results using high‐quality marker genes (as shown in a).

Journal: Small Methods

Article Title: Robust Spatial Cell‐Type Deconvolution with Qualitative Reference for Spatial Transcriptomics

doi: 10.1002/smtd.202401145

Figure Lengend Snippet: Analysis of mouse olfactory bulb data. a) H&E staining of the olfactory bulb (top) and the deconvolution results of all candidate methods displayed by the spatial scatter pie plot of cell‐type composition on each spatial location. The examined cell types were granule cells (GC), olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs), periglomerular cells (PGC), mitral/tufted cells (M‐TC), and external plexiform layer interneurons (EPL‐IN) b) Manual annotation of anatomic layers (top), including the granule cell layer (GCL), the mitral cell layer (MCL), the glomerular layer (GL), and the nerve layer (ONL), and the spatial domains of different deconvolution methods visualized by spatial scatters of specific domain types. c) Performance comparison between candidate deconvolution methods, including QR‐SIDE, STdeconvolve, CARDfree, RCTD, CARD, SPOTlight, and spatialDWLS in terms of NMI (left) and ARI (right). d) UMAP plots of gene expression for Topic 1, 2, 3 identified by QR‐SIDE. The color scheme of each topic domain was the same as in (b). e) The heatmap of normalized expression level for the top 10 DE genes for topic domain 1, 2, 3. f) The correlation between DE genes of identified domains and marker genes of each cell type. g) The mean expression level of an example marker gene list for QR‐SIDE, where Tyro3 was included as the interference marker gene of cell type GC. h) Left and middle panels: The estimated spot‐separable η scores of correct marker Penk and misclassified marker Tyro3 . Right panel: The line plots of mean η of all markers across all spatial spots and the RMSE between estimated cell‐type composition by varying the inclusion of top 3‐7 marker genes of each cell type as the input gene list and the deconvolution results using high‐quality marker genes (as shown in a).

Article Snippet: These include the mouse olfactory bulb ST data from Spatial Transcriptomics v1.0 ( https://www.spatialresearch.org ), the four human hepatocellular carcinoma Visium datasets ( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra?linkname=bioproject_sra_all&from_uid=858545 ), mouse anterior brain 10x Visium data ( https://support.10xgenomics.com/spatial‐gene‐expression/datasets/1.0.0/V1_Mouse_Brain_Sagittal_Anterior ), and mouse posterior brain 10x Visium data ( https://support.10xgenomics.com/spatial‐gene‐expression/datasets/1.0.0/V1_Mouse_Brain_Sagittal_Posterior ).

Techniques: Staining, Comparison, Gene Expression, Expressing, Marker

Salus-STS high-resolution spatial transcriptomics enables effective cell identification at the subcellular level. (A) Schematics illustrating of the study. (B) Results of cell segmentation via the Salus Cellbins Algorithm. (C–F) Distributions and medians (red text in the figures) of the area (in pixel 2 ) (C) , UMI counts (D) , gene numbers (E) , and proportions of mitochondrial UMIs (F) of segmented cellbins.

Journal: Frontiers in Reproductive Health

Article Title: Spatiotemporal dynamics of spermatogenesis: insights from high-resolution spatial transcriptomics and pseudotime trajectories in mouse testes

doi: 10.3389/frph.2025.1747902

Figure Lengend Snippet: Salus-STS high-resolution spatial transcriptomics enables effective cell identification at the subcellular level. (A) Schematics illustrating of the study. (B) Results of cell segmentation via the Salus Cellbins Algorithm. (C–F) Distributions and medians (red text in the figures) of the area (in pixel 2 ) (C) , UMI counts (D) , gene numbers (E) , and proportions of mitochondrial UMIs (F) of segmented cellbins.

Article Snippet: In this study, we used Salus-STS high-resolution spatial transcriptomics (∼1 μm resolution) and Salus Cellbins Algorithm to characterize the spatial transcriptomic profile of mouse testes at single-cell level.

Techniques:

Cellbin-based analysis enables accurate identification of distinct cell types in the mouse testis. (A) RCTD-annotated distinct cell types and their proportions. (B) UMAP visualization of the Salus-STS Cellbin data with scRNA-Seq data. (C) Spatial distribution of distinct cell types in the mouse testis. (D) Integrated distribution map of cell distributions in the mouse testis. (E) Markers of distinct cell types and their expression levels. Scaled expression: the average expression level scaled across genes to eliminate the effect of total expression level differences among genes. Percentage: for each cell type, the percentage of cellbins that express the specific gene out of all cellbins of the same type.

Journal: Frontiers in Reproductive Health

Article Title: Spatiotemporal dynamics of spermatogenesis: insights from high-resolution spatial transcriptomics and pseudotime trajectories in mouse testes

doi: 10.3389/frph.2025.1747902

Figure Lengend Snippet: Cellbin-based analysis enables accurate identification of distinct cell types in the mouse testis. (A) RCTD-annotated distinct cell types and their proportions. (B) UMAP visualization of the Salus-STS Cellbin data with scRNA-Seq data. (C) Spatial distribution of distinct cell types in the mouse testis. (D) Integrated distribution map of cell distributions in the mouse testis. (E) Markers of distinct cell types and their expression levels. Scaled expression: the average expression level scaled across genes to eliminate the effect of total expression level differences among genes. Percentage: for each cell type, the percentage of cellbins that express the specific gene out of all cellbins of the same type.

Article Snippet: In this study, we used Salus-STS high-resolution spatial transcriptomics (∼1 μm resolution) and Salus Cellbins Algorithm to characterize the spatial transcriptomic profile of mouse testes at single-cell level.

Techniques: Expressing

High-resolution spatial transcriptomics uncovers spatiotemporal markers of spermatogenesis. (A) Pseudotime trajectory analysis. (B) Randomly selected seminiferous tubules. (C,D) Top 6 genes with expression levels positively (C) and negatively (D) correlated with the axis from the tubule basement membrane (epithelium) to the lumen center respectively.

Journal: Frontiers in Reproductive Health

Article Title: Spatiotemporal dynamics of spermatogenesis: insights from high-resolution spatial transcriptomics and pseudotime trajectories in mouse testes

doi: 10.3389/frph.2025.1747902

Figure Lengend Snippet: High-resolution spatial transcriptomics uncovers spatiotemporal markers of spermatogenesis. (A) Pseudotime trajectory analysis. (B) Randomly selected seminiferous tubules. (C,D) Top 6 genes with expression levels positively (C) and negatively (D) correlated with the axis from the tubule basement membrane (epithelium) to the lumen center respectively.

Article Snippet: In this study, we used Salus-STS high-resolution spatial transcriptomics (∼1 μm resolution) and Salus Cellbins Algorithm to characterize the spatial transcriptomic profile of mouse testes at single-cell level.

Techniques: Expressing, Membrane

SpaIM comprises an ST autoencoder and an ST generator. Both the ST autoencoder and the ST generator are built on the multilayer recursive style transfer (ReST) layers.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: SpaIM: single-cell spatial transcriptomics imputation via style transfer

doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-63185-9

Figure Lengend Snippet: SpaIM comprises an ST autoencoder and an ST generator. Both the ST autoencoder and the ST generator are built on the multilayer recursive style transfer (ReST) layers.

Article Snippet: Spatial transcriptomics (ST) autoencoder The ST autoencoder (Fig. ) comprises multilayer ReST encoders.

Techniques:

a Benchmarking results on the NanoString CosMx spatial transcriptomics dataset (Lung5–rep3), using evaluation metrics including structural similarity index measure (SSIM) and Jaccard similarity (JS). Data are presented as mean values ± 95% confidence intervals across predicted genes ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$n$$\end{document} n = 2,038). b Spatial visualization of cell types in the whole slide. c Spatial visualization of cell types in specific field of views (FOVs).

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: SpaIM: single-cell spatial transcriptomics imputation via style transfer

doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-63185-9

Figure Lengend Snippet: a Benchmarking results on the NanoString CosMx spatial transcriptomics dataset (Lung5–rep3), using evaluation metrics including structural similarity index measure (SSIM) and Jaccard similarity (JS). Data are presented as mean values ± 95% confidence intervals across predicted genes ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$n$$\end{document} n = 2,038). b Spatial visualization of cell types in the whole slide. c Spatial visualization of cell types in specific field of views (FOVs).

Article Snippet: Spatial transcriptomics (ST) autoencoder The ST autoencoder (Fig. ) comprises multilayer ReST encoders.

Techniques:

a Benchmarking results on the NanoString CosMx spatial transcriptomics dataset (Lung5–rep3), using evaluation metrics including structural similarity index measure (SSIM) and Jaccard similarity (JS). Data are presented as mean values ± 95% confidence intervals across predicted genes ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$n$$\end{document} n = 2,038). b Spatial visualization of cell types in the whole slide. c Spatial visualization of cell types in specific field of views (FOVs).

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: SpaIM: single-cell spatial transcriptomics imputation via style transfer

doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-63185-9

Figure Lengend Snippet: a Benchmarking results on the NanoString CosMx spatial transcriptomics dataset (Lung5–rep3), using evaluation metrics including structural similarity index measure (SSIM) and Jaccard similarity (JS). Data are presented as mean values ± 95% confidence intervals across predicted genes ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$n$$\end{document} n = 2,038). b Spatial visualization of cell types in the whole slide. c Spatial visualization of cell types in specific field of views (FOVs).

Article Snippet: Spatial transcriptomics (ST) generator A similar architecture (Fig. ) is used to generate ST data from SC data.

Techniques:

Major cell type annotation. Spatially resolved transcriptome ( A ) and t-SNE plots ( B ) showing representation of five major cell types in the tongue tissue. ( C ) Cell Chat software revealed the number and strength of inferred cellular signaling interactions from the spatial transcriptomics data.

Journal: mBio

Article Title: A spatial transcriptomic atlas of the host response to oropharyngeal candidiasis

doi: 10.1128/mbio.00849-25

Figure Lengend Snippet: Major cell type annotation. Spatially resolved transcriptome ( A ) and t-SNE plots ( B ) showing representation of five major cell types in the tongue tissue. ( C ) Cell Chat software revealed the number and strength of inferred cellular signaling interactions from the spatial transcriptomics data.

Article Snippet: To analyze the microenvironment during OPC, we employed the 10× Genomics Visium spatial transcriptomics technology on frozen tissue sections ( n = 4) from tongues of normal and C. albicans -infected Balb/c mice at 60 h of OPC (hereby referred to as day 2, for ease of representation).

Techniques: Software